WiFiRanger Converge

WiFiRanger has been around a long time providing connectivity solutions for RVs and boats. Their new platform is called Converge, and is a mix of different components that can provide a whole solution for internet aboard. I’ve had one for a few months, and below is an overview and some results from my initial testing.

Converge Platform

Converge packaging

Converge is a combo of indoor and outdoor components. The outdoor piece is a fin-shaped antenna enclosure that can be upgraded, and the indoor part is a router that comes in several different flavors. The idea behind this is something I support very much – modularity. Being able to upgrade the fin antenna on the roof with newer or more LTE radios is very attractive, and so is being able to choose the right size indoor unit.

There’s another reason I really like this design, and it’s because the LTE radios and antennas, along with the 2.4Ghz WiFi radio for grabbing remote signals, are all outside. This means there are no cables running from inside to outside, adding loss to the signal. Many of the other products I use and test are all indoors, with the antennas only outside, which adds some complexity and signal loss.

Outside Antenna

Converge Denali

Right now WiFiRanger offer two outdoor fin antennas – the Teton and Denali. The Teton only has a 2.4Ghz WiFi radio in it, and lower power than the Denali, and would be useful more in the RV world, or for someone who has access to a remote WiFi network to connect to, perhaps a liveaboard in a marina. The Denali has a more powerful 2.4Ghz WiFi radio and a category 4 LTE radio. The Teton goes for $129, and the Denali for $499.

There is a third unit planned called the Everest which will have both 2.4 and 5 Ghz WiFi radios (yes!) and the capability to have dual LTE radios – one category 6 and one category 4. This would put it more in competition with products from Cradlepoint and Peplink that offer dual LTE radios and both WiFi bands, although the second LTE radio is an option, and the price for this unit is listed at $799 but I’m not sure if that comes with the second LTE radio.

When the Everest comes out, it will be one of a handful of other solutions that have dual band outdoor WiFi, like the MikroTik Groove, and will allow you to connect to 5Ghz and 2.4Ghz remote WiFi sources. This has been one of the most difficult things to find, and something that is a necessity in many installations I’ve done (and my own marina) because of noise and interference on 2.4Ghz. However, it would also be good idea to look at other solutions, as once you get to $799 for the unit plus $100 for the indoor router, you are in the price range of several commercial solutions that may have advantages.

Indoor Router

Spruce indoor router

There are two indoor routers available – the Poplar and the Spruce. The Poplar is very basic and only supports 2.4Ghz WiFi at $79, while the Spruce is $119 and does both 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz. Both have 5 ethernet ports.

Given the proliferation of new devices supporting 5Ghz, and how messy marina WiFi is, I would always spend the extra and go with the Spruce.

WiFiRanger give discounts for buying a Denali+Spruce or Teton+Poplar together. You’ll see that on the Denali/Teton store pages on their site. The combo I’m testing is around $550 total.

Packaging and Materials

The entire setup came in one, very well designed box with excellent packaging and protection. It also included installation instructions, and an AT&T SIM card that had already been pre-installed in the Denali.

Because I already had an AT&T SIM, this required I open up the antenna and swap it for the one I already had. Strangely, there were no instructions included to activate the included AT&T SIM, and I had to contact support for more information. WiFiRanger offer plans through AT&T and for someone relying mostly on WiFi, as I imagine most traditional RV’ers do, they look OK.

For most boaters, $90 for for 22GB/month of data is quite high. I personally go through over 100GB/month which would cost me $300! There are alternative providers out there that use the same networks and provide better pay-as-you-go solutions.

Power supply options included

The Converge comes with a fused lead (bottom right above) to connect to your DC power system. However, you can also get an AC wall wart, which I did for testing. In addition, there is a Y cable that provides DC power to the indoor and outdoor pieces. It’s really nice to have a fused lead and power connectors for everything right out of the box.

Denali Details


  • 2.4Ghz high power WiFi radio + 2 antennas to grab remote signals
  • Single category 4 LTE radio
  • GPS antenna

The Denali is designed to be mounted outdoors and grab remote WiFi and LTE signals and send those down an ethernet cable to the indoor unit. It could also be used standalone and connected to a PC or another non-WiFiRanger router. A third option is to use one of the 2.4Ghz radios to broadcast a local WiFi signal in case you didn’t want an indoor router. Lots of options for deployment – I will be using mine connected to the Spruce router, with the Denali doing 2.4Ghz WiFi externally (searching for a remote signal) and using the LTE radio as a backup internet source.

Converge Denali outdoor unit

The outdoor unit is a single fin antenna enclosure and included cabling. I chose a 30′ long cable as I didn’t know where I would install it. This includes both power and ethernet, but they are separate cables – no PoE here, which would be nice to see in future versions, since the Spruce supports it.

The Denali can be mounted using screws or sealant. You can also access the innards, which I had to do to swap my SIM card, and you may have to do for an upgrade, by removing the 6 philips screws around the outside edge.

Once you have the top off, you will see two tall antennas, which are for the 2.4Ghz WiFi radio, and other bits and pieces.

Looking a little closer at the components, you can see a GPS, LTE antennas, ethernet cable to the indoor router, and chips for the LTE and WiFi radios. This appears to be a custom board that WiFiRanger have built.

You can carefully lift the whole assembly out of the tray, and on the back of the unit, there is a power connector and the SIM slot. This is where I had to remove the factory provided one, and add my own. Not the easiest spot to get to, and it requires a lot of patience to put things back together correctly.

One thing I had concerns about is the way everything fit together. Once you remove the top of the fin antenna, it is very hard to get everything back inside and closed up. There is some slop until things are tightened down. I am a bit more worried about the entry point for the cable on the back of the unit, which has space for things to get up inside, and the entire edge of the top of the fin. While it overlaps the outside of the base, there are no water tight seals of any kind, which might be an issue in terms of longevity.

The Denali is a pretty neat piece of gear – aerodynamic fin that has lots of radios and antennas packed inside, and allows for an easy mount somewhere outside. I really like the idea of being able to upgrade or swap out the components, and the fact that the LTE and WiFi radios are outside and able to reach signals much more efficiently than other products.



  • 5 ethernet ports (one used by Denali unit)
  • 2.4 & 5Ghz WiFi access point
  • 802.11 n/a/c – WiFi 5
  • USB port

The Spruce is a 5 ethernet port device (one used by the Denali) with both 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz WiFi radios inside of it. It is branded MikroTik but runs WiFiRanger software.

It is an hAP AC2 model and has really good specifications. You can mount it either on the stand you see above, or flat on a desktop.

The Spruce also has a USB port which can be used for connecting a MiFi or other LTE device if you choose not to have a Denali, Everest or Teton outdoor unit.

The Denali connects to port 5 of the Spruce, and after powering everything up, they should talk to each other and be ready for configuration.


One thing that WiFiRanger has always had is very focused software, and the Spruce+Denali = Converge setup is no different. Very clear status is visible on the main page, and everything you’d need to do when arriving at a new location is easily found as well.

I really love the mountain background with the product name – it’s a nice touch that offers a slightly less clinical screen that are so popular with routers and tech gear.

In this case, my Spruce is connected to the Denali using WFRControl and we’re connected to LTE and WiFi.

You can see a list of available nearby WiFi networks, which one we’re connected to, and choose to reconnect/disconnect, plus other settings.

Up in the top right corner is the software/firmware version, whether we’re connected to the “cloud” which allows WiFiRanger to access things remotely, uptime, and serial number.

What isn’t obvious is that most of this data is coming from the Denali unit outdoors – it’s the one that is scanning for WiFi networks, connected to LTE, etc. and is providing that information over the cabled connection to the Spruce. This is also where I’ve seen some confusing things, which I’ll cover below.

If you expand the WiFi arrow, you can see details about the WiFi network we’re connected to which can be helpful when troubleshooting.

You can also configure the WiFi system to pick a network based on a number of different criteria, which is a very, very nice feature. These include First Available, First Tagged, Strongest Signal, Fastest Available, and Fastest Tagged. This is a great way of being able to categorize the WiFi networks near you and choose what is the most important – speed or signal strength – when connecting.

The WiFi tab has lots of useful settings including the networks you want to connect to remotely, the various bands you want to broadcast indoors, SSID and password, and more. You can also setup a guest network with a bunch of helpful settings.

These settings are for the Spruce, not the Denali, well most of them. You can have the Denali broadcast a WiFi network that matches the one inside. I suspect this may be for while you’re outside, but I also saw it affect my performance when trying to use a remote WiFi network as my internet source.

The setup section is where it gets interesting. I’ve disabled “Hide Advanced Features” so I can see everything. You can see the various Internet Connectors, and for the Spruce, I’ve moved the “WFRControl Denali” to the top of the list. This is the outdoor Denali unit, and I want it to be my primary source of internet. Other than the confusing naming, it is nice to have this level of control.

If I wanted, I could use an Ethernet port, one of the Spruce’s WiFi radios, or a USB connected device to provide internet as well. Very flexible!

Also on this page is how you configure failover, although I’m not clear if this does anything or if the Denali’s settings override this. Same with the Multi-WAN mode.

There are profiles you can create/load for various settings, which is handy if you like flipping over to a different order of devices or failover settings when on WiFi vs LTE or at particular locations.

The Spruce does not by default collect usage information, but it is easy to turn on, and contains a nice set of graphs. Unfortunately, on the Spruce it only shows one “Internet Connector” which is the Denali, so there’s no way for me to know if this bandwidth has been used by my LTE radio or WiFi connections. You have to look on the Denali for this.

Under status you can see the connection being used, IP addresses, interfaces, and devices connected to the internal WiFi access points. You can also set static DHCP leases.

The advanced screen contains ways to forward ports, DNS overrides, and security for logins to the dashboard, among other things.

If we head over to the Denali, there are an identical set of tabs/pages, but slightly different data on some of them.

The most important one is the Setup tab. I’ve changed the default order which was to use Internal WiFi WAN first, and Cellular 1 second. Within each of these there are a bunch of settings as well, especially for the Cellular 1 Internet Connector, but I left them all at the defaults. You can see your IMEI and other SIM details, and choose providers, etc.

There are also profiles below, as there are on the Spruce, for some standard configurations which is helpful. Since all I ever do would be to change the priority order of WiFi and Cellular 1, I opted to use the arrows instead of creating a new profile, but I could see where that could be beneficial as you could customize the settings under each.

Stability and Maturity

I applaud WiFiRanger for creating software that is more streamlined than most commercial products I’ve used/tested. If you’ve ever used Peplink or Cradlepoint, they have decent UIs, but they are still technical and can be confusing. If you’ve tried a MikroTik device, you know the opposite end of the spectrum where you immediately begin to age and get grey hair the moment you start clicking through options.

However, there is room to grow. The most confusing thing is how the Denali and Spruce are separate units, but not. Some things can only be done on the Denali, but changing other settings will cause the Spruce to lose its mind.

Then there are confusing terms like WFRControl and Failover which aren’t really defined anywhere, and screens showing interfaces and IP addresses that the average user wouldn’t need to see.

The most frustrating thing though is the stability of the software. Even though the “Initial Auto Connect” feature was on all of the time, I never saw the system automatically connect to anything without me intervening. Once connected to LTE, if I attempted to connect to WiFi, the Spruce became very laggy, and I often lost my internet connection completely until things stabilized, sometimes 3-4 minutes later. I’ve also had to reboot the system a lot to get things working again.

I appreciate this is a new system and software, and I know that WiFiRanger is working on improving it. Even in the last few weeks, I’ve seen a lot of improvement with new firmware, but it has a ways to go.


I had to contact support a number of times for various reasons. Most were around the initial version of software that shipped with the unit, which needed to be upgraded. However, I had other issues around stability and lots of configuration questions.

Support was very quick to respond via email (my preferred method) – usually the same day or within 1 business day. They were helpful and friendly, but most of the time asked to simply connect remotely to the unit to fix the issue instead of providing steps for me to do so.

Being a hands-on tech person, that was somewhat frustrating, but for those that aren’t, this sort of support could make the difference in a purchasing decision. Having someone else who knows the product fix your issue remotely is definitely a big benefit. You do have to be connected to the internet for this to work though.

I would highly recommend their support.

Testing Results

Testing was good in some areas, and OK in others. In terms of performance of the indoor WiFi router, that was excellent, as you would expect with hardware backed by MikroTik. I never had any disconnects or performance issues, and it was as strong or stronger than my other on board systems. Same with the ethernet ports, although I would not have expected any issues here.

The outdoor 2.4Ghz WiFi AP that connects to remote signals worked very well also. It was pretty close to the performance of using a MikroTik Groove or Ubiquity Bullet, and found and held on to remote WiFi signals well.

The outdoor LTE radio was very good. Because the radio and antennas are outside, the distance between the antennas and the actual thing doing the work was very small, resulting in little loss, and the antennas weren’t inside being blocked by boat stuff. This meant very high download and upload speeds, as well as strong signal even when far away from towers. On AT&T I saw 80Mbps download and 50Mbps upload for multiple days in a row in one location, which is pretty awesome performance.

Spruce showing the LTE radio of the Denali connected, but the Internet is “OFFLINE”

The challenging thing was reliability. The software linkage between the Spruce and the Denali would sometimes get out of sync and as a result, the internet connection would go down for multiple minutes while things synced and figured themselves out.

Some of this I think has to do with the failover technology that WiFiRanger employ, which is much less aggressive than what I’ve seen on other products. By default the lowest setting to switch between sources is 5 minutes, which is a long time to be disconnected – people will notice.

The reliability has improved with every new software release they have come out with, and WiFiRanger have been very up front with the fact this is a new product and that they’re refining things. Their support has also been great at looking into any of the issues and tuning the units to get the most out of them.

Overall, the performance was on par with the best systems out there in terms of WiFi and LTE radios and bandwidth. The most important thing will be to see the reliability improve over time.


  • Streamlined user interface
  • Powerful radios
  • Modularity & upgradability
  • Support


  • Build concerns
  • Software – still a work in progress
  • SIM card access


I think WiFiRanger have hit on a good mix of modularity and power in their new Converge line. I like how I can choose the different pieces, and potentially upgrade them in the future without ripping out everything. The LTE and WiFi radios are very powerful and work extremely well.

However, it is still a work in progress – the software is getting better, the install process for the SIM card is difficult, and the long-term viability of the components could be a concern in the marine environment.

The Converge is in an interesting price bracket at $550 – you can’t get all of these features in a Peplink or Cradlepoint system. You’d have to spend $100-200 more for the extra ethernet ports and an external WiFi antenna or booster like the MikroTik Groove, and they would be disparate pieces. But, that system would have a lot more features, and be more commercial grade.

If you are looking for a powerful indoor WiFi system that pairs with an equally powerful outdoor WiFi and LTE system, then the Converge could be a good fit. Everything is included in one package, support is excellent, and is much simpler to use than other commercial products.

Thank you to WiFiRanger for providing the Converge system used for testing in this article. I will be using it for future testing and updates.

You Might Also Like...

19 thoughts on “WiFiRanger Converge”

  1. Steve,
    thank you for your fantastic reviews and guides. What is your opinion on the Wave Rogue Pro DB? I’m thinking of combining that (instead of your recommended Microtik Groove due to easier UI) with your recommended Pepwave Max Transit and Poynting Omni 400 LTE antenna.
    Thanks in advance,

    • I haven’t tested any of the newer Wave Rogue products because I buy almost all of my own products, and theirs are quite expensive.

      That would be my biggest negative of the Wave Rogue Pro DB – almost $700 for something you can get for $90? I don’t think the UI and marine grade pieces are worth $600+ more, especially when an entire router costs about that much and has more features. Perhaps if the power is also 2x or much higher than the Groove, plus those other features, and I would consider paying that much….

      I also use LTE far more in the last few years than WiFi, and while I still want it as an option, I would rather spend my boat bucks on that side of the world.

  2. Steve,

    Great site – I found you via Panbo and despite you turning to the dark side and buying a powerboat I’ve greatly enjoyed reading your stuff. I too have a tech background (but have a sailing boat).

    My solution to internet access onboard my boat, in Europe/UK, has been using a combination of a Teltonika product and a Ubiquity bullet. I’m just upgrading from an old RUT550 (that had started to overheat) to a new RUTX11. Have you any experience with these? They are industrial kit with all that implies for both the UI and build (DIN rail mounting kits etc). The RUTX11 has dual sim slots for the LTE with MIMO, bluetooth, GPS, 2.4G and 5G wifi, as well as 4 cabled ports (one configurable asa WAN uplink). I have a masthead cellular antenna (20m up) and very heavy low loss coax (installed by a previous owner which it must be 20mm diameter) to the nav station where the RUT box lives. I suspect that the cable losses probably outweigh the benefits of the masthead antenna, but I do get quite good reception upto 4-5nm offshore. I then basically use the system as MiFi unit.

    The Bullet is only temporarily installed at present, but my plan is to find an elegant mount for it and leave it permanently hooked in via the WAN port of the RUTX11. Do you know anyone who’s got a neat marine mount for the Bullet? I’m starting to wonder about getting someone to fabricate something…

    • Hi Tom,
      Thanks for the kind words.
      I have played with a RUT550 and seen the RUTX11 but never had the chance to use it for any length of time. Their products are hard to get here in the US, otherwise, I would love to test and review the RUTX11 as it looks like a great piece of hardware. Their software, from what I remember, isn’t quite as good as Peplink or Cradlepoint, but they are quite a bit cheaper.

      I would agree on the cable length – even if it is amazing cable, you’re likely losing enough of the benefit with that length of a run, and everything else that might be near it.

      There are a few mounts but they are all sold as a package deal from places like Coastal Marine WiFi or WiFiRanger who have custom software on the bullet, and end up charging a decent price for the entire setup. Last I saw some were in the range of $500 which is probably not worth it if you already have the Bullet….

      • Thanks. The X11 seems to have a much better UI than the 550. I’m keen to get it installed – it’s sitting on the table at home at the moment.

        The cable length issue has me wondering about installing a deck level antenna – or the tectonica all in one antenna and external enclosure – perhaps even up the rig.

        I’m going to have a think about neat bullet to marine mounts. If I get something to work I’ll report back.

        • I’ve seen solutions, like the Wirie AP (not sold anymore), that put all of the parts in a Pelican case, and mounted that outside. It really improved the remote WiFi capabilities, and LTE when they came out with it, since the antennas were already outside and didn’t require long cable runs. They also used small 1-2′ antennas, and even with that, the performance was good. I had several of their products as well as one or two brands I can’t remember, and they were all good solutions.

          The problem was that then the local WiFi was compromised by being outside. Certain places inside the boat wouldn’t get signal, so they had options for an ethernet cable to an indoor router, which solved the issue, and there’s no signal loss issues to deal with on the ethernet side for most boats.

          The Converge is very similar in that it has the LTE and remote WiFi antennas outside, and the router inside. You could do something similar with your X11 outside and another standard home router inside if there was an issue with signal coverage.

    • Jeepers – It’s like 2 inches (sorry, 5cm) long and weighs about an ounce… can’t believe there isn’t a better shipping option! Anyhow good luck, I think you’ll like it.

  3. Thanks for the review Steve! I already have a Mikrotik bullet 5Ghz and another Mikrotik router/AP. (frankly Ive been having some pain setting this up with Elliot Bay marinas wifi options. )

    Would you install one of these over say the pepwave Max LTE modem (for the LTE access)

      • Yes, I’ve already played with one – technically it is a Category 18 LTE radio which supports band 71 and a few others as well. Band 71 is important specifically in the US for T-Mobile as that is the new frequency band they are using for their more rural and longer haul radio signals. Having that will provide better support out on a boat theoretically, although I have not been able to test it, and there are very few devices that support B71, so your mileage may vary.

        I’m waiting, as this version is the single LTE radio version, and I suspect there will be a dual radio (MAX Transit Duo) of the CAT18 radios, even if the second radio is CAT12/CAT8/CAT6 (which is normal for them) that will be a better solution for me.

    • I prefer the Peplink MAX Transit Duo LTE router plus a MikroTik. I find it is more powerful and flexible. But the WiFi Ranger Converge is still a very powerful solution, it just has 2.4Ghz remote WiFi only and only one LTE radio with less capabilities.

  4. With the WiFiRanger Spruce being a MikroTik hAP AC unit running WiFiRanger software, I’m curious what are your thoughts on the Spruce vs the MikroTik hAP AC as a stand-alone router solution (assuming the software stability is solved)? I’m thinking specifically your DIY Heaven configuration – I really don’t want to be locked into all the bundling of the Denali and have no place to mount that fin form factor. The WiFiRanger software appears much friendlier, but unclear how much depends on linking with the Denali.

    • Hi Brian,
      Interesting question. The Spruce can be used fully standalone, and does not require the Denali. You can even connect a USB LTE device and have that as an internet source, and I think there might be even other ways to do that as well. You will be limited to what features that WiFiRanger have built in the hardware – you’ll want to look through the screen shots I have or their documentation to make sure you’re not interested in using MikroTik-specific stuff.

      The Spruce as a standalone router is a great deal since it is essentially the high powered MikroTik WiFi radios but with much better software from an ease of use perspective.

  5. Can someone share the physical measurements of the WifiRanger outdoor router enclosure? It’s an odd shape, but the H x W x D would suffice. Thanks!


Leave a Comment